Post by j7oyun55rruk on Jan 1, 2024 10:51:18 GMT
This is an everyday example of a moral dilemma that we all face in one way or another. The American Journal of Science published a study explaining how people make decisions in such situations. Moral Compromise Systems When we face moral dilemmas, our ideas of what is right and what is wrong conflict with each other. Scientists have shown that at this time the so-called moral compromise system is activated. This cognitive system helps to reconcile Conflicting moral values in the head, weighing them and partially satisfying them.
This process happens unconsciously: sorting all possible solutions, building C Level Contact List a correctness function, and then choosing the most correct solution or rather, a Temporary ideas correspond to solutions. The system of moral compromise has certain characteristics. Let's take the hunter-gatherer dilemma as an example. The system generates all kinds of judgments: from aggressive to compromised. Hunter-gatherers fish all day long. The gains were minimal: it was not enough to feed the children and sick brother. At this time, the neighbors were smoking fish. Collectors asked to share.
They give him fish, but much less than he asks for. Yes, stealing is wrong. But neither was ignoring the fact that his brother was ill. What decision can he make? Don't steal anything, part or all of the fish. all of these options. Judgment depends on incentives. Incentives determine which solutions are available to us and what we can do. Our collectors consider how each stolen fish will speed up the brother's recovery and how much it will hurt his neighbors. For example, he might decide that he can steal all the neighbor's fish if it saves his brother's life.
This process happens unconsciously: sorting all possible solutions, building C Level Contact List a correctness function, and then choosing the most correct solution or rather, a Temporary ideas correspond to solutions. The system of moral compromise has certain characteristics. Let's take the hunter-gatherer dilemma as an example. The system generates all kinds of judgments: from aggressive to compromised. Hunter-gatherers fish all day long. The gains were minimal: it was not enough to feed the children and sick brother. At this time, the neighbors were smoking fish. Collectors asked to share.
They give him fish, but much less than he asks for. Yes, stealing is wrong. But neither was ignoring the fact that his brother was ill. What decision can he make? Don't steal anything, part or all of the fish. all of these options. Judgment depends on incentives. Incentives determine which solutions are available to us and what we can do. Our collectors consider how each stolen fish will speed up the brother's recovery and how much it will hurt his neighbors. For example, he might decide that he can steal all the neighbor's fish if it saves his brother's life.